And this is what I find crazy about some of these teachings. I know there is something to it; it's been repeated by so many over thousands of years. They found something in the 'live in the now' but how the hell do they ignore past and future in the mind?Merlin wrote: You see, I have already talked about this "live in the now" thing but I never really quite got it.
But that's the thing though, not every newbie lives in the now beyond the moments of meditation. What Tolle (and many others before him) say that it is a 'state of being' like the quote above. It's not an hour of meditation or even a day of sensory deprivation. It's complete immersion in the present moment without using the mind to mull over the past or project into the future with thinking, hypothesizing, daydreaming.Merlin wrote: But this could be it, by not thinking of the past nor the future and thinking of nothing, this "All that is" thing may need to make us do something and THAT could be the moment where we get clues and answers and vibration and parallel changes. Who knows.
Even if this is true, these answers might take a while to come and are not THAT HUGE otherwise, every newbie in meditation would have attracted all that they wanted after their 1st meditation week-end seminar.
How to do that in every (or even most) moments of your life? Damned if I knew
And I think this is the part where our understanding of reality as frames and his understanding as a single, present moment cross into different paths. We and Tolle both agree that time is an illusion. But so do so many others including Einstein.Merlin wrote: The way I understand it is that the past, the present and the future are all different frames just like the picture frames in a film strip. They are all present at the same time and TIME is just the action of going through those frames 1 after the next...........
So what does this "live in the NOW" means EXACTLY? Focus only on frame 5 and hope that All that is will shift you to the vibration of frame 10 and *poof* there you are seeing your goal!
Again, I just don't get it.
He believes that the past only existed as a present moment, and to remember it is to reject the present and escape into the 'sleep' of thinking. That's why he advocates 'no thought'. Apparently, constant thought creates a state of sleep where you ruminate about the past or project into a fictional future. According to him, thought should only be used as a tool (like solving a coding error). With the present, 'all that is' emerges through you. Meh. I don't even know what that means
But he insists that creative impulses that lead to discoveries, great wealth, spectacular art come through these tiny moments when no thought exists and a human is completely absorbed in the present. His supporting evidence is that geniuses throughout time have been contemplative and needed space of immersion (and even they may not have realized that 'no thought' or 'in the present moments'_ allowed for creativity to emerge. He thinks that is why creative people are so rare compared to the majority obsessed with the mind's thoughts, and its constant immersion in past & future.
So, he probably doesn't see reality as frames the way we do.