Cancer Research

In this forum, the topics are up to you. Whether it's about Law of Attraction, Science, Metaphysics, Spiritual, World Events and News, etc....
User avatar
Merlin
Site Admin
Posts: 21469
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:35 am
Location: Montreal

Re: Cancer Research

Post by Merlin »

That's cool stuff.

However, i'm passed the physical products now. 2 years ago I would have digged deeper into this research but not anymore. I went from chemo to oxygen therapies, Ozone and then PH therapies like Cesium for cancer and other diseases.

Now thank to research made by other guys like Dr. Bruce Lipton, he said that the previous model was that genes were controling our cells which in turn would control all the problem our body would go through but he found out that there is something above the genes that's having an impact on our cells so there is no need for buying physical products anymore.

All we have to do is master how to change our beliefs and change the perception or our environment so that we change our cells and cure our problem.

Like Tony Robbins said in his clip, when beliefs are changed disease like diabetes can go in a flash. I'm pretty sure it can be the same for cancer, aids and all the other diseases out there.

I created NAPs to reprogram my SM to attract my money goals but I didn't see how important this research would turn out to be regarding health.

Merlin
Larey12

Re: Cancer Research

Post by Larey12 »

Yeah - agree with ya! Naps could be the answer to all our health problems. But it's good to know of other alternatives just incase those who are dear to us are ill and won't use the Naps.
User avatar
Merlin
Site Admin
Posts: 21469
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:35 am
Location: Montreal

Re: Cancer Research

Post by Merlin »

Yes of course, that's why I would still order a bottle of Cesium if I get cancer.

And NAPs is not the only method to change beliefs.

Merlin
Silver

Re: Cancer Research

Post by Silver »

I've been doing a lot of research, and it seems that cancer is caused by carbohydrate consumption.
User avatar
Merlin
Site Admin
Posts: 21469
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:35 am
Location: Montreal

Re: Cancer Research

Post by Merlin »

Silver wrote:I've been doing a lot of research, and it seems that cancer is caused by carbohydrate consumption.
Hi Silver and welcome to this forum.

You are close but it's not quite accurate.

Carbohydrates is just another name for sugar or glucose and sugar is what ALL our cells need to get energy by transforming it into ATP (energy) using a complex bio chemical reaction called the Krebs Cycle. You remove glucose from your system and you die from lack of energy.

I said you were close because during the Krebs Cycle, there are 2 phases and while normal cells complete both of them, cancer cells completes only the first phase leaving an acidic solution within the cell membrane turning it into an low pH cancer cell.

if you want more details on this, do some research on Otto Warburg, 1931 medecine Nobel prize winner and his student Hans Krebs (who discover the chemical cycle) who also received a Nobel prize.

Cheers,


Merlin
Silver

Re: Cancer Research

Post by Silver »

Merlin wrote:
Silver wrote:I've been doing a lot of research, and it seems that cancer is caused by carbohydrate consumption.
Hi Silver and welcome to this forum.

You are close but it's not quite accurate.

Carbohydrates is just another name for sugar or glucose and sugar is what ALL our cells need to get energy by transforming it into ATP (energy) using a complex bio chemical reaction called the Krebs Cycle. You remove glucose from your system and you die from lack of energy.

I said you were close because during the Krebs Cycle, there are 2 phases and while normal cells complete both of them, cancer cells completes only the first phase leaving an acidic solution within the cell membrane turning it into an low pH cancer cell.

if you want more details on this, do some research on Otto Warburg, 1931 medecine Nobel prize winner and his student Hans Krebs (who discover the chemical cycle) who also received a Nobel prize.

Cheers,


Merlin
If I remember correctly, carbohydrates are not essential nutrients. If you cut out protein and fat, you will die. If you cut out carbohydrates, you won't. The reason why I would link carbohydrate consumption to cancer would be because in civilizations that eat a purely carnivorous diet, there was not a single case of cancer.
User avatar
Merlin
Site Admin
Posts: 21469
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:35 am
Location: Montreal

Re: Cancer Research

Post by Merlin »

Silver wrote:If I remember correctly, carbohydrates are not essential nutrients.
Let's see...

This is taken from Wikipedia:

"...The carbohydrates (saccharides) are divided into four chemical groupings: monosaccharides, disaccharides, oligosaccharides, and polysaccharides. In general, the monosaccharides and disaccharides, which are smaller (lower molecular weight) carbohydrates, are commonly referred to as sugars.[1] The word saccharide comes from the Greek word σάκχαρον (sákkharon), meaning "sugar"."

Merlin
Silver

Re: Cancer Research

Post by Silver »

Merlin wrote:
Silver wrote:If I remember correctly, carbohydrates are not essential nutrients.
Let's see...

This is taken from Wikipedia:

"...The carbohydrates (saccharides) are divided into four chemical groupings: monosaccharides, disaccharides, oligosaccharides, and polysaccharides. In general, the monosaccharides and disaccharides, which are smaller (lower molecular weight) carbohydrates, are commonly referred to as sugars.[1] The word saccharide comes from the Greek word σάκχαρον (sákkharon), meaning "sugar"."

Merlin
This is ALSO taken from Wikipedia:

"Carbohydrates are not essential nutrients in humans: the body can obtain all its energy from protein and fats."
User avatar
Merlin
Site Admin
Posts: 21469
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:35 am
Location: Montreal

Re: Cancer Research

Post by Merlin »

Silver wrote:This is ALSO taken from Wikipedia:

"Carbohydrates are not essential nutrients in humans: the body can obtain all its energy from protein and fats."
Yeah I was just reading that part when you posted it. That's interesting. I wonder how the cells extract the ATPs from protein and lipic cells?

One thing is sure, cancer is caused by the non-completion of the Krebs Cycle leaving all this acid inside the cell. It can't breath and burn the sugar anymore and starts to ferment glucose.

Btw, EVEN if you don't eat sugar, the acid from the cancer cells will be turned back into glucose by the liver in a process called the cachexia cycle.

So it could be possible that by eating protein and fat only you can live and not die but if you have cancer it's because you have had an interuption of the Krebs Cycle and that cycle can only be there if you have intruduced Carbohydrates/sugar in the process but eating Carbohydrates is not THE cause of cancer. I have ate a ton of Carbohydrates today and I won't get cancer from this.

First of all we would have hell of a time stopping eating Carbohydrates because they are everywhere including fruits.

Merlin
Liina

Re: Cancer Research

Post by Liina »

Silver wrote: If I remember correctly, carbohydrates are not essential nutrients. If you cut out protein and fat, you will die. If you cut out carbohydrates, you won't. The reason why I would link carbohydrate consumption to cancer would be because in civilizations that eat a purely carnivorous diet, there was not a single case of cancer.
Might want to check out Dr. T. Colin Cambell's book The China Study before you turn to complete carnivore :) His (been a researcher in MIT, Cornell etc) research indicates in fact that excessive protein (animal protein in particular) and cancer are linked.
Post Reply